1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 11 F.3d
  5. 11 F.3d 1060 (1993)
 

BRODT v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

No. 93-3351.

11 F.3d 1060 (1993)

A. Charles BRODT, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Charles Brodt, submitted pro se.

Joyce Friedman, Atty., Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, DC, submitted for respondent. With her on the brief were Mary L. Jennings, Deputy Gen. Counsel and Anita Marshall, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel. Of counsel were Michael K. Martin, Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, DC, and David M. Cohen, Director and Bryant G. Snee, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC.

Before RICH, NEWMAN, and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

A. Charles Brodt, a preference eligible employee of the Postal Service, appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket No. SF344393-238-I-1, that it lacks jurisdiction over his appeal. Since the decision of the Postal Service which Mr. Brodt contests does not constitute an appealable personnel action, we affirm the Board's decision.

BACKGROUND

Mr. Brodt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases