1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 509 N.W.2d
  5. 509 N.W.2d 561 (1993)
 

HYLAND v. STATE

No. C9-93-1017.

509 N.W.2d 561 (1993)

Ronald HYLAND and Gail Hyland, d/b/a G & R Transportation, Appellants, v. STATE of Minnesota, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 24, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald J. Riach, Franke and Riach, P.A., Roseville, for appellants.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Kenneth H. Bayliss, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondents.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and HUSPENI and SCHUMACHER, JJ.

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants Ronald Hyland and Gail Hyland (the Hylands) challenge summary judgment dismissing their claims of defamation, tortious interference with business relations, and violation of the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act against the Minnesota Department of Transportation and its employees (MnDOT), because the MnDOT employees were protected by absolute immunity and official immunity. We affirm.

FACTS

The Hylands...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases