Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial because the testimony of a backup police officer bolstered the testimony of the undercover officer who had purchased narcotics from the defendant. Any error in the admission of such bolstering testimony must be deemed harmless in light of the ample opportunity which the undercover officer had to observe the defendant during the commission of the crime and the undercover...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.