ESPINOSA v. VAN DORN PLASTIC MACHINERY CO.

No. 91 Civ. 3416 (LAP).

813 F.Supp. 252 (1993)

Zanaida ESPINOSA and Alfredo Espinosa, Plaintiffs, v. VAN DORN PLASTIC MACHINERY COMPANY, DIVISION OF VAN DORN COMPANY, Defendants. VAN DORN COMPANY, Third Party Plaintiff, v. ALBEST METAL STAMPING COMPANY, Third Party Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Ford, Ford Marrin Esposito Witmeyer & Gleser, New York City, for Van Dorn.

William M. Kimball, New York City, for Albest Metal Stamping Co.


PRESKA, District Judge.

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, Van Dorn Company ("Van Dorn") has moved, by letter brief, to have the third party action tried by a jury on the basis that the jury demand in the main action controls trial by jury on the third party complaint.

Facts

Plaintiffs, Zanaida and Alfredo Espinosa commenced a products liability action against Van Dorn in New York State Court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Van Dorn removed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases