SAIF v. ROBERTSON

WCB 90-00264 & 90-04391; CA A69780.

852 P.2d 212 (1993)

120 Or. App. 1

In the Matter of the Compensation of Steven W. Robertson, Claimant, and In the Matter of the Complying Status of Shuman Equipment Company, Employer. SAIF CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Steven W. ROBERTSON and Shuman Equipment Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 12, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Robert D. Wollheim, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent Steven W. Robertson. With him on the brief, was Welch, Bruun & Green, Portland.

Mark P. Bronstein, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent Shuman Equipment Co. On the brief were Richard Wm. Davis and Davis and Bostwick, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

SAIF seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order affirming the referee's determination that SAIF provided coverage to employer at the time of claimant's injury. SAIF argues that the Board erred in finding that it failed to provide a written denial of coverage as required by ORS 656.740(2) and that, therefore, coverage was conclusively presumed. We affirm.

Claimant injured his back...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases