1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 164 B.R.
  5. 164 B.R. 892 (1993)
 

IN RE MILFORD GROUP, INC.

Bankruptcy No. 5-91-00024. Adv. Nos. 5-91-0037, 5-92-0041.

164 B.R. 892 (1993)

In re MILFORD GROUP, INC., Debtor. MILFORD GROUP, INC., Gerald E. Swendsen, Melvin C. Swendsen, Dorsan, Inc. and Three Lanes Utility, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. NORTHEASTERN BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, Lester Lieberman, Ralph Miller, Richard Miller, Samall Associates, Inc., John "Duke" Schneider, ILM Corporation and Richard Snyder, Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania, Wilkes-Barre Division.

July 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Solfanelli, Scranton, PA, and Lee C. Krause, Honesdale, PA, for Milford Group, Inc., debtor/plaintiff.

Helen Davis Chaitman, Somerset, NJ, for Milford Group, Inc., Gerald E. Swendsen, Melvin C. Swendsen, Dorsan, Inc. and Three Lanes Utility Inc., plaintiffs.

George Clark, Scranton, PA, Trustee for Milford Group, Inc., debtor.

William Slaughter, Philadelphia, PA, Michael Donohue, Scranton, PA, and Edward Swichar, Philadelphia, PA, for Northeastern Bank of PA, defendant.

Stephen Bresset, Honesdale, PA, and Howard Rothenberg, Scranton, PA, for Lester Lieberman, Ralph Miller, Richard Miller and ILM Corp., defendants.

Robert N. Opel, Kingston, PA, John J. Schneider, Milford, PA, and Ellen McDowell, Philadelphia, PA, for Samall Associates, Inc., defendant.

Matthew D'Annunzio, Philadelphia, PA, for Samall Associates Inc. and Richard Snyder, defendants.

Charles Kannebecker, Port Jervis, NY, for John "Duke" Schneider, defendant.

Edward Monsky, Scranton, PA, for John "Duke" Schneider (Weinstein & Schneider), defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court are various Motions filed by the above-captioned parties, namely, a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State the Claim upon which Relief can be Granted and, in the alternative, a Motion for a More Specific Pleading and Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Complaint under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter was commenced by Complaint of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases