1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 534 Pa.
  5. 534 Pa. 519 (1993)
 

MILLS v. COM.

534 Pa. 519 (1993)

633 A.2d 1115

Ethel MILLS, Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania and Penn's Landing Corporation, Appellants. Anita and Joseph HALBER, Appellees, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority and Penn's Landing Corporation, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred W. Putnam, E. Graham Robb, Philadelphia, for Penns Landing Corp.

Peter A. Dunn, Media, for appellants.

T. Jonathan Hankin, Paul C. Quinn, Philadelphia, for Ethel Mills.

Allan E. Ells, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth.

Sharon L. Steingard, Philadelphia, for Anita & Joseph Halber.

Carolann M. Leuthy, Philadelphia, for City of Philadelphia.

Before LARSEN, FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

These consolidated cases question the scope of immunity provided by the Recreation Use of Land and Water Act ("RUA"), 68 P.S. § 477-1 et seq., to the owners of a clearly defined 37 acre tract of land containing various improvements. For the reasons that follow we find that the owners of the land in question, Penn's Landing in Philadelphia, are not entitled to immunity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases