1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 852 P.2d
  5. 852 P.2d 200 (1993)
 

WHALEY v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CA A69239.

852 P.2d 200 (1993)

120 Or. App. 224

Leslie A. WHALEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie A. Whaley, Salem, filed the brief pro se.

Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LEESON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Rules held valid.

Petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 291-158-005; OAR 291-158-010; OAR 291-158-015 and OAR 291-158-015(10) as not having been adopted in compliance with the notice provision of ORS 183.335(2)(a) and OAR chapter 291, division 1. The notice given complied with the applicable statute and administrative rules.

Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases