1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 992 F.2d
  5. 992 F.2d 59 (1993)
 

WALDREP BROS. BEAUTY SUPPLY v. WYNN BEAUTY SUPPLY CO.

No. 92-1802.

992 F.2d 59 (1993)

WALDREP BROTHERS BEAUTY SUPPLY, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WYNN BEAUTY SUPPLY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lowell S. Fine, Zoe Ileana Martinez, Alembik, Fine & Callner, Atlanta, GA, argued, for defendant-appellant.

Orville Gilbert Calhoun, Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, Greenville, SC, argued (H. Donald Sellers, Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, Stuart G. Anderson, Jr., Anderson, Fayssoux & Chasteen, Greenville, SC, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HOWARD, District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Business competition produces success and failure; over time, only firms that satisfy their customers will survive. In this diversity case, plaintiff seeks to erect the tort law of South Carolina as a barrier to the forces of market competition. The customers in this case, Redken Laboratories, Inc. and Sebastian International, producers of beauty products, terminated their at-will contracts with plaintiff Waldrep Brothers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases