1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 2 F.3d
  5. 2 F.3d 1047 (1993)
 

N.L.R.B. v. GREATER KANSAS CITY ROOFING

No. 92-9507.

2 F.3d 1047 (1993)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GREATER KANSAS CITY ROOFING; the New Greater Kansas City Roofing, Inc.; Maude Clementine Clarke, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

August 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Fleischer, Sr. Atty. (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, with him on the brief), N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Daniel B. Denk (Katherine E. Rich, with him on the brief) of McAnany, Van Cleave & Phillips, P.A., Kansas City, KS, for respondent.

Before EBEL, Circuit Judge, McWILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge, and OWEN, Senior District Judge.

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This case comes before us on application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB"). The parties dispute the NLRB's decision to utilize the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil in order to hold the respondent, Maude Clementine Clarke ("Tina Clarke"), personally liable for a judgment rendered against the corporation she controlled. We hold that the NLRB erroneously pierced the corporate veil in this case in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases