Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the identification testimony of three police officers should have been precluded because he did not receive adequate notice pursuant to CPL 710.30. However, by pleading guilty the defendant forfeited his right to seek reversal on this ground (see, People v Taylor,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.