McKAY CREEK VALLEY v. WASHINGTON COUNTY

LUBA 92-216; CA A79900.

857 P.2d 184 (1993)

122 Or. App. 28

McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Lewis, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

David C. Noren, Asst. County Counsel, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was John M. Junkin, Washington County Counsel, Hillsboro.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Washington County amended section 440-6 of its development code to provide:

"Alterations to a nonconforming use or structure to reasonably continue the nonconforming use or structure are permitted through a Type I, II or III procedure. Alteration includes a change in nonconforming use of a structure or parcel of land; or replacement, addition or modification in construction to a structure." (Emphasis supplied.)

Petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases