WEINSTOCK v. GOLDSTEIN


190 A.D.2d 847 (1993)

Israel Weinstock, Appellant, v. Stanley Goldstein et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 22, 1993


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint because of the plaintiff's failure to allege special damages (see, Aronson v Wiersma, 65 N.Y.2d 592). The allegedly defamatory statements did not address the subject of the plaintiff's ability to practice his profession and were not disparaging of his mental capacity and competence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases