CONKLING v. KEISLING

SC S40199.

852 P.2d 183 (1993)

316 Or. 390

Gary L. CONKLING, Petitioner, v. Phil KEISLING, in his capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Oregon, and Shirley Gold, Cedric Hayden, Don McIntire, Gail Shibley and Barbara Seymour, in their capacities as members of the explanatory committee for Ballot Measure One, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided May 27, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Gardner, of Gardner, Cosgrove & Gardner, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the petition was Lynda Nelson Gardner.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, waived appearance for respondents.


GILLETTE, Justice.

This is an original proceeding for judicial review of a Ballot Measure Explanatory Statement1 for Ballot Measure No. 1, a proposed constitutional amendment. Petitioner is an elector of this state who is dissatisfied with that statement. Respondent Keisling, as Secretary of State, is responsible for placing the Explanatory Statement in the Voters' Pamphlet. The other respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases