Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant maintains on appeal that reversal is required as to one count of robbery in the first degree and one count of grand larceny in the first degree, relating to the robbery of a jewelry store, due to the receipt into evidence of physical evidence illegally seized without a warrant, namely, papers recovered from his automobile which came from the jewelry store.
Contrary to the conclusion of the hearing court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
