McKAY CREEK VALLEY v. WASHINGTON COUNTY

LUBA No. 92-238; CA A79679.

857 P.2d 167 (1993)

122 Or. App. 59

The McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION and Chris Clark King, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Respondent, and Karban Corporation, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Liberty, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners-cross-respondents.

David C. Noren, Sr. Asst. County Counsel, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was John M. Junkin, Washington County Counsel, Hillsboro.

William A. Monahan, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Timothy V. Ramis, Portland.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of and respondent Karban Corporation (respondent) cross-petitions from LUBA's remand of Washington County's approval of respondent's application to operate an aggregate processing facility in an exclusive farm use zone. LUBA rejected the county's contrary conclusion and held that the proposed use was not one authorized by ORS 215.213(2)(d), at least under the theories that respondent preserved, because the aggregate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases