1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 20 Cal.App.4th
  5. 20 Cal.App.4th 1002 (1993)
 

AUTOMOTIVE MGMT. GROUP, INC. v. NEW MOTOR VEHICLE BD.

Docket No. H009979.

20 Cal.App.4th 1002 (1993)

24 Cal. Rptr.2d 904

AUTOMOTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NEW MOTOR VEHICLE BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF AMERICA, INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

December 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robertson, Alexander, Luther, Esselstein, Shiells & Wright and Harold C. Wright for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Floyd D. Shimomura, Assistant Attorney General, Cathy A. Christian, Susan P. Underwood and Geoffrey L. Granbill, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Elizabeth A. Grimes and Alicia J. Bentley for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

ELIA, J.

Automotive Management Group, Inc. (AMG) protested its termination as a franchised dealer of respondent/real party in interest Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc. (MMSA). AMG'S protest was rejected because it was untimely. AMG petitioned for a writ of mandate. The trial court found that substantial evidence supported the administrative law judge's (ALJ) determination that AMG's protest was untimely. It therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases