1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 3 F.3d
  5. 3 F.3d 1015 (1993)
 

U.S. v. DIMAS

Nos. 92-2975, 92-2976, 93-1688 and 93-1884.

3 F.3d 1015 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter S. DIMAS and Ramon Roman, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 18, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry R. Elden, Asst. U.S. Atty., Criminal Receiving, Appellate Div., Robert Christopher Cook (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Chicago, IL, for U.S.

Marvin Bloom (argued), James LaVecchia, Chicago, IL, for Peter S. Dimas.

James LaVecchia, Bruce Cowan (argued), Chicago, IL, for Ramon Roman.

Before CUDAHY and KANNE, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted the defendants of various drug offenses. These consolidated appeals challenge those convictions on three grounds. Two of the grounds lack merit. However, the record is insufficient for us to review the third, which concerns the denial of a motion for a new trial, so we vacate that ruling and remand for an evidentiary hearing limited to that issue.

I.

On April 23, 1991, Peter Dimas and Ramon Roman were caught selling a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases