Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In his testimony before the jury, and through counsel, the defendant contended that he broke into the complainant's premises because he was homeless and was looking for a place to sleep, as opposed to having an intent to steal.
The defense claims that the trial court was too restrictive in its rulings as to the defendant's efforts in presenting this version to the jury, and that given the defendant's assertion that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
