COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS v. FRAME

No. 21627.

433 S.E.2d 579 (1993)

189 W.Va. 641

COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS, Complainant, v. Clark FRAME and J. Michael Benninger, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Decided July 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherri D. Goodman, Charleston, for complainant.

Clark B. Frame and J. Michael Benninger, pro se.


PER CURIAM:

The hearing panel of the Committee on Legal Ethics ("the Committee") has found that attorney Clark Frame violated Rule 1.7(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct through the following actions: (1) failing to understand the importance of client loyalty in determining whether a conflict of interest existed; (2) failing to discuss the issue of the conflict with either client once all facts were known; and (3) trying to rationalize away the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases