STATE v. HANDLEY

No. 92-1083-CR.

173 Wis.2d 838 (1993)

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel A. HANDLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided January 20, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs and oral argument of Keith A. Findley, assistant state public defender.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general and Sharon Ruhly, assistant attorney general. Oral argument by Sharon Ruhly.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ.


ANDERSON, J.

Daniel Handley appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 809.30(2)(h), Stats. Handley argues that the trial court's requirement that he deposit $2000 on account as a condition of probation to cover yet unneeded counseling expenses of the victims was invalid because the court did not follow the provisions of the restitution statute, sec. 973.20, Stats., and because restitution may not be imposed for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases