TOPOLIC v. SAIF

WCB 90-14609; CA A76488.

857 P.2d 152 (1993)

122 Or. App. 94

In the Matter of the Compensation of Pete Topolic, Claimant. Pete TOPOLIC, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Productive Painting, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Howser, Ashland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Judith H. Uherbelau and Howser & Munsell, P.C., Ashland.

Michael O. Whitty, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


RIGGS, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board (Board) order holding that he did not have an unscheduled disability and was not entitled to permanent total disability. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Claimant was born in Yugoslavia in 1941 and speaks with a heavy accent. His education is limited to four years of elementary school and four years of trade school in Yugoslavia. He sustained a compensable injury in October, 1988, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases