ELI LILLY AND CO. v. MARSHALL

No. D-2003.

850 S.W.2d 155 (1993)

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and Dista Products Company, a Division of Eli Lilly and Company, Relators, v. The Honorable John MARSHALL, Judge, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Dissenting Opinion April 14, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark E. Smith, Robert G. Hogue, Dallas, Joe C. Freeman, Jr., Atlanta, GA, Wade C. Smith, Dallas and John L. Hill, Houston, for relators.

Paul L. Smith and William V. Dorsaneo, III, Dallas, for respondent.


Dissenting Opinion by Justice Doggett April 14, 1993.

OPINION

CORNYN, Justice.

Today we consider a second mandamus arising out of a products liability suit against the manufacturer of the antidepressant drug Prozac.1 Eli Lilly and Company, the manufacturer, seeks to compel the Honorable John Marshall, Respondent, to set aside his order requiring it to disclose certain information rendered confidential by federal regulation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases