Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant, who was 25 years old at the time of the incident, was convicted of various charges of sexual misconduct involving a 14-year-old girl. Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in precluding cross-examination of the victim concerning her prior sexual conduct (see, CPL 60.42; People v Crawford,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.