1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 999 F.2d
  5. 999 F.2d 1 (1993)
 

AKTIEBOLAGET ELECTROLUX v. ARMATRON INTERN., INC.

Nos. 92-2388, 92-2439.

999 F.2d 1 (1993)

AKTIEBOLAGET ELECTROLUX, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ARMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, Appellee. AKTIEBOLAGET ELECTROLUX, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. ARMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided July 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Hayes, with whom Dean G. Bostock, and Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Hayes, Boston, MA, were on brief, for plaintiff, appellant.

Arnold E. Cohen, with whom Englander, Finks, Ross, Cohen & Pike, Inc., Boston, MA, was on brief, for defendant, appellee.

Before TORRUELLA, CYR and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

This is a trademark infringement and unfair competition action under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.1 Appellant Aktiebolaget Electrolux holds a trademark for a line of gardening products called "Weed Eater." Appellee Armatron International, Inc. subsequently sold a gardening product variously called "Leef Eeter," "Leaf Eater," "Flowtron Leaf Eater," and "Vornado Leaf Eater." For convenience...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases