MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW v. WILCOX

No. 19403.

843 P.2d 154 (1992)

123 Idaho 4

MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Respondent, v. Shirley Mae WILCOX, Defendant-Respondent, and JOHN DOES A THROUGH R, Intervenors-Respondents-Intervenors-Respondents-Cross Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, September 1992 Term.

December 3, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benoit, Alexander, Sinclair, Doerr, Harwood & High, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-appellant. J. Walter Sinclair argued.

Wright Law Offices, P.A., Idaho Falls, for defendant-respondent Wilcox. Jon J. Shindurling argued.

Weinpel, Woolf & Combo, Idaho Falls, for intervenors-respondents Does. William R. Combo argued.


McDEVITT, Justice.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

A. The Underlying Action.

On August 18, 1989, twelve anonymous plaintiffs filed suit against Shirley Mae Wilcox ("Wilcox"), her ex-husband, the state of Idaho, and ten unnamed employees of the state of Idaho. In the complaint, plaintiffs alleged that the Wilcoxes were employed by the state of Idaho at the Child Development Center and provided respite...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases