MORRIS v. WEATHERLY

Nos. C2-92-264, C0-92-330.

488 N.W.2d 508 (1992)

Leonard MORRIS, et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence WEATHERLY, Appellant. John A. HINMAN, Respondent, v. Reid ALTER, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Sieben, Hastings, for Leonard Morris, et al.

Albert J. Dickinson, St. Paul, for Lawrence Weatherly.

James T. Hansing, Minneapolis, for John A. Hinman.

Jon R. Hebeisen, St. Cloud, for Reid Alter, et al.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and FOLEY, JJ.


OPINION

DANIEL P. FOLEY, Judge.*

This is a consolidated appeal involving two actions for injuries caused by a dog under a strict liability theory pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 347.22 (1990). Appellants in both cases contend the statute does not apply where the dog did not physically contact the injured party. We affirm.

FACTS

Morris v. Weatherly (C2-92-264)

On July 26, 1987, as respondent Leonard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases