1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 836 P.2d
  5. 836 P.2d 157 (1992)
 

STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. ENGEWEILER

9002-80469; CA A66013.

836 P.2d 157 (1992)

114 Or. App. 575

In the Matter of Engeweiler, Conrad Robert, A Child. STATE ex rel. JUVENILE DEPARTMENT, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, v. Conrad Robert ENGEWEILER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary B. Bertoni, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Saxon, Marquoit & Bertoni, Portland.

Michael C. Livingston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

RIGGS, Judge.

Child appeals from an order of the juvenile court remanding him to adult court. He claims that the juvenile court did not have authority to order psychological evaluations in preparation for the remand hearing and that there was insufficient evidence to support the court's finding that it was in child's best interests and in the best interests of society to remand him. We review de novo, State ex. rel. Juv. Dept. v. Slack, 17 Or.App. 57,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases