STEWART v. KING

89C-10559; CA A68640.

836 P.2d 151 (1992)

114 Or. App. 490

Phyllis STEWART and Donald Skaife and Anna Lucille Skaife, husband and wife, Respondents, v. Warren Edward KING, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Duane Brown, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Churchill, Leonard, Brown & Donaldson, Salem.

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Defendant appeals a summary judgment for plaintiffs in this action for damages for breach of a sharecrop agreement. We affirm.

Plaintiffs and defendant each owned an undivided one-third interest in farm property. Plaintiffs had a sharecrop agreement with defendant, allowing him to farm the property as a tenant and to retain two-thirds of the proceeds of the crops. The remaining one-third was divided among the three parties as the owner's share...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases