1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 11 Cal.App.4th
  5. 11 Cal.App.4th 976 (1992)
 

NASIR v. SACRAMENTO CTY. OFF. OF THE DIST. ATTY.

Docket No. C011501.

11 Cal.App.4th 976 (1992)

15 Cal. Rptr.2d 694

BILAL NASIR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

December 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Joanna Rehm for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Acting Assistant Attorney General, W. Scott Thorpe and David A. Rhodes, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SPARKS, J.

In this appeal we examine the procedural requirements for a nonjudicial forfeiture of property seized for illegal drug trafficking. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11470 et seq.) Among other things, the procedural statute governing such an administrative forfeiture requires the district attorney to give notice to the owner of the seized property setting forth the appraised value of the property as well as instructions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases