1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 184 A.D.2d
  5. 184 A.D.2d 800 (1992)
 

PEOPLE v. STOCKWELL

184 A.D.2d 800 (1992)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Stockwell, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 4, 1992

Crew III, J.

Defendant claims that impermissible use was made of his postarrest silence by the prosecutor during summation. No objection was made to the comments at the time of summation. Immediately thereafter, however, defense counsel objected to the comments and requested curative instructions as part of the charge to the jury, requesting specifically that County Court advise the jury that defendant had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases