1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 188 A.D.2d
  5. 188 A.D.2d 792 (1992)
 

SPIRO v. DELMAR TRAVEL BUREAU, INC.

188 A.D.2d 792 (1992)

Murle Spiro, Respondent, v. Delmar Travel Bureau, Inc., Also Known as Delmar Travel Bureau, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 10, 1992

We find that plaintiff was properly granted leave to amend her complaint to include the correct corporate name of defendant in that the original summons and complaint gave defendant adequate notice of the commencement of the action and an opportunity to defend (see, Matter of Great E. Mall v Condon, 36 N.Y.2d 544, 548-549; City of Mount Vernon v Best Dev. Co., 268 N.Y. 327; cf., Pinto v House, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases