1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 820 F.Supp.
  5. 820 F.Supp. 150 (1992)
 

SCHWARZKOPF TECHNOLOGIES v. INGERSOLL CUTTING TOOL

Civ. A. No. 91-464-JJF.

820 F.Supp. 150 (1992)

SCHWARZKOPF TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. INGERSOLL CUTTING TOOL COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

March 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Richards, III, of Richards Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE. David H. Pfeffer, and Michael A. Nicodema, of Morgan & Finnegan, New York City, for plaintiff.

F.L. Peter Stone, of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE. John F. Flannery, and James J. Hamill, of Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery, Chicago, IL, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Defendant Ingersoll Cutting Tool Company's Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition, Plaintiff Schwarzkopf Technologies Corporation (Schwarzkopf) has filed a Motion to Strike Defendant's Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Defendant Ingersoll Cutting Tool...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases