Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree based on accessorial liability. In his defense, the defendant essentially testified that he tried to stop the robbery of one of the complainants.
We disagree with the defendant's contention that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial when the prosecutor repeatedly suggested, in cross-examination and summation, that the defendant had a duty both to report...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.