ODOM v. CAROLINA CAS. INS. CO.


529 Pa. 435 (1992)

604 A.2d 1023

Barbara ODOM and Jerome Odom v. CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Keystone Insurance Company. Appeal of CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided April 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wallace J. Knox, Matthew J. McLaughlin Knox, McLaughlin, Gornall & Sennett, P.C., Erie, for appellant.

John W. McCandless, Erie, for Keystone Ins. Co.

Robert C. Ward, Erie, for Barbara Odom and Jerome Odom.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.


ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

CAPPY, J., files a concurring opinion.

CAPPY, Justice, concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the Majority in its per curiam affirmance. However, I do not agree that our decision in Azpell v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 526 Pa. 179, 584 A.2d 950 (1991) is controlling. See, Hackenberg v.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases