1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 483 N.W.2d
  5. 483 N.W.2d 481 (1992)
 

KAY v. PETER MOTOR CO., INC.

No. C1-91-1251.

483 N.W.2d 481 (1992)

Bobbie J. KAY, Respondent, v. PETER MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 31, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Feigh, Hall, Byers, Hanson, Steil & Weinberger, P.A., St. Cloud, for respondent.

Douglas P. Anderson, Rosenmeir, Anderson & Vogel, Little Falls, for appellant.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and PARKER and MULALLY, JJ.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court's determination that (1) the company had notice of sexual harassment where the chief executive officer was the perpetrator of the harassment, (2) punitive damages were appropriate given the circumstances of the case, and (3) evidence of the supervisor's treatment of other employees was admissible. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Peter Motor Company, Inc. is a closely held corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases