HOLMES v. WATSON-FORSBERG CO.

No. C9-90-2637.

488 N.W.2d 473 (1992)

Thomas R. HOLMES, Respondent, v. WATSON-FORSBERG COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Petitioner, Appellant, v. PRO-TECH ROOF SYSTEMS, INC., Third-Party Defendant, Respondent, and Employee Benefit Administration, Intervenor, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Gwin, Michael D. Barrett, Cousineau, McGuire & Anderson, Chartered, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Wayne Tritbough, Dale O. Thornsjo, Peterson & Hektner, Ltd., Minneapolis, for Pro-Tech Roof Systems, Inc.

Tyrone P. Bujold, William E. Dorigan, Minneapolis, for Thomas R. Holmes.

John H. Faricy, Jr., M. Chapin Hall, Minneapolis, for Employee Ben. Admin.

Todd M. Goderstad, St. Paul, and A. Patrick Leighton, Steven D. Snelling, Moore, Costello & Hart, St. Paul, for amicus Assoc. Gen. Contr. of MN.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


WAHL, Justice.

Upon petition of Watson-Forsberg, the general contractor in a construction project in St. Anthony, we review a decision of the court of appeals which reversed a partial summary judgment1 entered in Watson-Forsberg's favor on its motion for a judicial declaration that it was entitled to indemnification from the third-party defendant-subcontractor Pro-Tech Roof Systems, Inc., to the extent of the insurance specified in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases