WISE v. OHIO DEPT. OF REHAB. & CORR.

No. 92AP-838.

84 Ohio App.3d 11 (1992)

WISE, Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County.

Decided November 24, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Wise, Jr., Pro se.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Gary D. Andorka, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.


WHITESIDE, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Richard Wise, Jr. ("appellant"), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court and raises two assignments of error as follows:

"A. First Assignment of Error: The Court erred as a matter of law in ruling for the defendants without determining whether justiciable issue had been made and failing to declare, in its judgment entry, rights of the parties, which is an abuse of its discretion.

"B....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases