Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of his due process right to a fair trial by the admission of the complainants' lineup identifications which were tainted by a suggestive photographic identification procedure at which the complainants jointly viewed a stack of photographs on top of which the defendant's picture had been placed. The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the identification procedure...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
