1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 256 N.J.
  5. 256 N.J. Super. 676 (1992)
 

JORDAN DEVELOPERS v. PLANNING BD.

256 N.J. Super. 676 (1992)

607 A.2d 1054

JORDAN DEVELOPERS, INC. AND GOTTARDI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF BRIGANTINE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Capizola argued the cause for appellants (Capizola, Fineman, Kutner & Pagliughi, attorneys, Michael D. Capizola and Barbara R. Lapham on the brief).

Daryl F. Todd argued the cause for respondent (Todd, Gemmel, Nugent & Fitzgerald, attorneys, Daryl F. Todd on the brief).

Before Judges R.S. COHEN, A.M. STEIN and KESTIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by R.S. COHEN, J.A.D.

Defendant Planning Board refused to extend municipal approvals for a development project or to toll the period of approval. The Law Division upheld the decision of the Planning Board, and plaintiffs appealed. We affirm.

Plaintiffs own property in Brigantine in a zoning district that permits multi-family uses. The property is occupied by 24-28 rental units in a former motel. Former owners obtained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases