IN RE CONSOLIDATED WELFARE FUND ERISA LITIGATION

MDL No. 902. No. 91-CIV-4031 (LJF).

798 F.Supp. 125 (1992)

In re CONSOLIDATED WELFARE FUND "ERISA" LITIGATION. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Plaintiff, v. GOLDSTEIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tess J. Ferrara, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Office of the Sol., Plan Benefits Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

A. Michael Weber, Carter K. Combe, Roberts & Finger, New York City, consenting defendants.

Broderick, Broderick & Redmond, Bayside, N.Y., for William Loeb.

Arnold Pedowitz, New York City, for Benefit Concepts, Inc.

Robert Benneman, Dublirer, Haydon, Straci & Victor, New York City, for Consolidated Local 867.

Richard M. Greenspan, White Plains, N.Y., for Anthony Bergamo.


ORDER

FREEH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Department of Labor ("DOL") has moved the Court to stay all state and federal court litigation pending against defendant Consolidated Welfare Fund (the "Fund"). The Court has received no objections to the entry of such a stay. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the DOL's motion is granted, and all cases against the Fund are stayed until further notice.

FACTS

The DOL instituted this action in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases