Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find no merit in the defendant's contention that he was the victim of misidentification and that the trial court erred in summarily denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress the identification testimony of a police officer. The officer had been working in the neighborhood of Elm Street and Oak Street in Yonkers for approximately four months prior to the drug transactions which led to the defendant's arrest...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.