CNG DEV. CO. v. LIMBACH

No. 91-211.

63 Ohio St.3d 28 (1992)

CNG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. LIMBACH, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 19, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue and John C. Duffy, Jr., for appellee and cross-appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Barton A. Hubbard, for appellant and cross-appellee.


Per Curiam.

First, on the commissioner's appeal, the commissioner argues that the BTA's analysis of the permissive tax procedures is incorrect and, alternatively, that CNG did not overcome its burden to establish the extent of her error by showing where the sales occurred. We disagree with the commissioner that the BTA misanalyzed the permissive tax procedures, but agree that CNG did not establish the extent of the commissioner's error.

Under R.C. Chapters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases