TORRES v. STULTZ

No. 91-1907.

601 So.2d 313 (1992)

Philip and Jane TORRES, Appellants, v. Amanda STULTZ, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied August 11, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barnett, Clark & Barnard, Miami, and Frances F. Guasch, Miami Lakes, for appellants.

Nuell, Baron & Polsky, Wolpe, Leibowitz, Berger & Brotman and Steven R. Berger, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Philip and Jane Torres appeal an adverse final judgment in an automobile accident case. The objections to several improper statements in closing argument were sustained, and in some instances curative instructions were given even though not requested. The complained-of remarks did not rise to the level which would call for a new trial, and the trial court acted well within its discretion in so ruling. See State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Guthrie...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases