PER CURIAM.
Petitioner has failed to show that he received inadequate representation from appellate counsel in his appeal as of right, in which judgment and sentence were affirmed. The appellate mandate was issued in September 1989.
The law in existence at times pertinent did not support raising on appeal the issue that temporal proximity is invalid as a departure reason. Had the issue been raised on appeal, it would have been found without merit. Failure...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.