COLUMBIA STEEL v. CITY OF PORTLAND

LUBA 89-058; CA A66052; SC S37716.

840 P.2d 71 (1992)

314 Or. 424

COLUMBIA STEEL CASTINGS CO. Respondent on Review, and Columbia Slough Development Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent on Review, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided October 22, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth Spetter, Sr. Deputy City Atty., Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review. With her on the petition was Jeffrey L. Rogers, City Atty., Portland.

James T. Waldron, Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent on review. With him on the response were Mildred J. Carmack and Steven W. Abel of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., filed a brief for amicus curiae Land Conservation and Development Com'n. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.


GILLETTE, Justice.

In this land use case, the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) affirmed amendments by the City of Portland (City) to its comprehensive plan and zoning map. The amendments applied an "environmental conservation overlay zone" to property in an area known as the Columbia Corridor, including property owned by Columbia Steel Castings Co. (Columbia Steel). The effect of the zone is to limit future uses that may be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases