FOLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES

No. 59241-1.

119 Wn.2d 783 (1992)

837 P.2d 14

TIMOTHY D. FOLEY, ET AL, Respondents, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Jay D. Geck, Assistant, for appellant.

Williams, Kastner & Gibbs, by Dennis D. Reynolds and Margaret A. Sundberg, for respondents Foley, et al.

James A. Connolly and Connolly, Holm, Tacon & Meserve, for respondents Selness.


JOHNSON, J.

RCW 75.30.210 places restrictions on who may commercially harvest sea urchins. The Department of Fisheries appeals the superior court ruling that RCW 75.30.210 is unconstitutional. We find that the statute complies with equal protection principles and reverse the Superior Court.

I

Sea urchins are spiny invertebrates resembling rolled-up porcupines. Young urchins must hide beneath the spines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases