STATE v. GILKEY

89CR1320; CA A66860.

826 P.2d 69 (1992)

111 Or.App. 303

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Dewey Ray GILKEY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 12, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed brief for appellant.

Janet A. Metcalf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

The issue is whether a trial court may impose, as a condition of probation, a requirement that defendant receive permission from the court or a probation officer before he contacts his wife.

In 1989, defendant pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine). ORS 475.992(4)(a). He was placed on two years' probation. In the probation revocation proceeding from which he appeals, defendant admitted that he had violated the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases