1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 810 F.Supp.
  5. 810 F.Supp. 82 (1992)
 

HARTMAN v. HARRIS

No. 90 Civ. 6203 (RLC).

810 F.Supp. 82 (1992)

Roland HARTMAN, Plaintiff, v. Robert HARRIS and Donald Hartman, Defendants, Renee Hartman, Intervenor.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Firm, New York City, for plaintiff (James M. Lane, of counsel).

Nathaniel M. Swergold, Cedarhurst, NY, for defendants.

Melvin W. Wolff, Mineola, NY, for intervenor.

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Roland Hartman ("Roland") brings this diversity action against his son, Donald Hartman ("Donald") and Robert Harris ("Harris"), for breach of contract and fraud.1 The defendants have moved, under Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment on each cause of action, contending that plaintiff's claims are invalid because they are based on an illegal contract.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases