Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's conviction of murder in the second degree arose out of the fatal shooting of his brother-in-law, Peter Ochetal, on February 16, 1989.
We agree with the defendant that the Supreme Court erred in denying suppression of certain physical evidence, i.e., the defendant's car. The defendant's car was retrieved by the police as a result of information supplied by the defendant in statements which were properly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
